AfroStreet

AfroStreet

Sunday, September 26, 2010

Sanctions on Zimbabwe will not be removed...at least for now


There is an ark that bends towards justice and the United States has shown that she is indeed standing up as the hegemon and giving voice to the many voiceless people who are being victimized by the Mugabe regime simply because they want to excercise their democratic right to participate in their own democracy.
Ms. Susan D. Page, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs echoed the following sentiment on behalf of the US Department
But frankly, as long as these violations of human rights, the lack of respect for civil and political rights of the people of Zimbabwe, as long as they continue, we really can’t lift the sanctions at this time, because people are looking to us as if we are the problem. And we are encouraging the Zimbabweans to look at themselves and address the problems that they’ve brought upon themselves.
She went on further to explain
So – but again, we stress the fact that as long as these violations of human rights, these arbitrary arrests, continued violence and brutality continue, we’re not in a position to lift our sanctions despite how they want to characterize them. And the sanctions that we have, as I mentioned, are very specific. They’re travel bans and asset freezes. And they affect 244 individuals and institutions, companies. That’s it.

We were advocating that sanctions not be removed until free and fair elections that ensure that there is no violence in Zimbabwe.
What is the reaction from Senator Inhofe's office since he declared
Under this new government, the Zimbabwe economy is starting to recover and democratic freedoms are reemerging

This is a victory for all the Zimbabweans living in Zimbabwe when the world says we will not be blinded by diamonds and we will stand up for democracy. More importantly it is the voice of the Zimbabwean that refuses to be quiet and stand up to fight for Zimbabwe. Finally Zimbabweans are demanding that they participate in the affairs of their own country and that they will not be silenced by violence or the prospect of diamond sales. Democracy is priceless,Zimbabweans must be heard.
 The violence that has ensued since the constitutional process began was all in an effort to silence the people into submission. The world did not stay silent and watch violence take place. Now we will see who really stands up for democracy.
In the words of Dr. Martin Luther King, "In the end we remember not the words of our enemies but the silence of our friends.'

Thursday, September 16, 2010

Bloomberg News in Hiring in Africa

Since the future is in emerging economies and the piece of the Asian market is already being divided up there remains one untapped market and of course entrepreneurs know its Africa!Inthat light then Bloomberg, the U.S. financial news agency, is seeking journalists with ability to file breaking news in the following cities/countries:Maseru,   DRC  Brazzaville, Congo RepublicMalabo, Eq. Guinea Bangui, Cent. African Republic Abidjan, Ivory Coast Bissau, Guinea-Bissau Banjul, Gambia Nouakchott, Mauritania Bamako, Mali N'Djamena, Chad Asmara, Eritrea Nairobi, Kenya Victoria, Seychelles Moroni, Comoros Sao Tome, Sao Tome&Prinicpe Praia, Cape Verde
Interested???
Please send a CV directly to ebowers1@bloomberg.net detailing yourjournalism experience, if you are located in one of these countries and are interested. Please check out http://www.bloomberg.com/ for the kinds of reporting they do and they prefer basic English proficiency as a minimum where possible. Please re-distribute widely.
Give the world the African's voice and tell Africa's story @ Bloomberg!!

When diamonds shine democracy fades in Zimbabwe





It used to be that diamonds were a girl’s best friend now it seems they are a guy’s best friend too. Senator Inhofe (R) Oklahoma wants the sanctions removed because he says that the people have suffered enough. For most Zimbabweans it is not really an issue of whether or not they should be removed it is a matter of the timing. The thought process is remove sanctions after free and fair elections to provide an incentive for Mugabe to ensure that there is no intimidation and that democracy prevails. Removing the sanctions will only weaken the hand of MDC as Mugabe will have not an incentive to honor the GNU (Government of National Unity). Senator Inhofe’s proposal will give Mugabe an opportunity to fund his militia groups through funds obtained from the sale of blood diamonds from Chiadzwa. The removal of sanctions will signal to Mugabe machinery that the America has become weakened by his resilience and will not stand by its principle of democracy, since Mr. Mugabe has not demonstrated real behavior change which brought the sanctions in the first place.
This will be a victory for Mugabe, and who can blame him for thinking this way? Removing sanctions without free and fair elections first will do nothing to promote democracy in Zimbabwe. A government of national unity is not a demonstration of democracy in action but a compromise. Where does that word consensus or comprise come from in a democracy? Is it premature to talk about sanctions removal? Or are the diamonds in Chiadzawa that are now clouding the Senator’s judgment and his values in democracy? When the bling starts blinging democracy starts trembling. Is the idea of sanction removal abandoning democracy to save democracy? Send a message to Senator Inhofe that you believe in democracy and tell him to stand for democracy in Zimbabwe just as he says he stands for it in America and remove sanctions only after free and fair elections. If you are pro-life then stand up for life in Zimbabwe, if you don’t then the blood of the Zimbabwean people is on your hands. Stop blood diamonds, save lives fight for a democratic Zimbabwe stand for sanction removal only after free and fair elections.
Senator Inhofe‘s DC office: Jared Young 202-224-5762 & Kathryn Junk 202-224-1282

Replace AID with Debt





Book Review Dead Aid by Dambisa Moyo

Dambisa Moyo tries to make the point that African governments should have long term plans for economic growth rather than just relying on government aid. Her tone however is condescending and her book does what Americans call ‘preaching to the choir’, winning her the applause of Steve Forbes and a few Africans in the Diaspora. She engages in a lot of generalities and addresses the issue of aid on a continent basis yet when she compares with other places she makes country to country comparisons. She paints Africa with the same paint brush as if the African experience is monolithic.

Moyo seems to suggest that corruption, market distortion, and further poverty are attributed to aid and not other factors. This seems too simplistic, she ignores the effects of colonialism, culture, brain drain and other factors. If aid is responsible for poverty in Africa how does Moyo explain poverty before aid began?
I am not a fan of people living in the Diaspora writing about the problems that face Africans on the continent particularly if they have spent a long time away from the continent and relying on secondary information to make their assertions. Ms Moyo who herself is a recipient of aid through scholarships has taken a new turn on the very action that afforded her a prestigious education that even Americans and Britons can only dream of. She is surprised that the road that Cecil John Rhodes the colonialist who dreamt of colonizing from Cape to Cairo is 85% tarred. I wonder why she is surprised.

Ms Moyo explains that the Chinese aid has accomplished in a few years what the western aid has failed to do over several decades. Why? Moyo does not answer the question satisfactorily. She raises an interesting question about why the U.K and U.S were giving aid to Zimbabwe of which she seemed unwilling to address perhaps because she knows the answer to that.

I am curious why foreign companies say that want to help Africans do not have Africans who live in Africa on their boards and opt for those like Moyo who have not lived on the continent for decades. Ms Moyo highlights Botswana has a model for Africa because of their large cash reserves and their adoption of capitalism and democracy. There is no doubt that this has been helpful because peace and stability give rise to foreign investment. Is foreign investment the measure of success in Africa? I would like to see us measure success in terms of the Africans that own the businesses. The Tswana may be successful but why have we not seen not even one of them on the Forbes billionaire list as we have seen from South Africa and Nigeria?

Moyo seems to engage in double speak as Orwell would call it. On C-span interview she denounces critics and says that she is talking about government to government aid but in her book she talks about micro-financing as the solution so which is it? Micro or macro which is it Moyo?

Her solution is Goldman Sachs in Africa and not Africans coming up with their own solutions. This culture of imitation & dependency through looking outside the continent for answers has to stop. If Goldman Sachs which is nicknamed in America Government Sachs had to receive government aid to avoid insolvency are they the right teacher of Africa economics?

Moyo is the sales person for banking industry that now wants to go into Africa to engage in a new market of debt.
She never mentions the thousands of millionaires in USDs out of Africa instead the sad stories that are perpetuated in main stream media. Her solution for Africa is not innovation but borrowing from World Bank, is that right? The borrower is always subject to the lender, let us not forget. Moyo wants to move from aid to debt, wow this is really the way forward? Look at Western economies riddled in debt is this really the model Africa should aspire to?
I am interested in what her answer would be about Spain and its use of aid to build infrastructure. Is she critical of that aid too? Moyo espouses the idea that some African countries are worse off now than they were under colonialism. This statement begs the question who is paying Dambisa Moyo to say these things? Again she engages in double speak you get the impression first that she is all for African economic independence then she makes such an ill informed statement. Undermining her own voice she appears to be a salesperson without her own authentic African voice. She is smart to stay on generalities rather than go into specifics because she knows that such statements are for some uninformed in certain circles.
Dambisa makes a valid point about why there are different models for developments for the rest of world and for Africa? She however does not answer the question. She knows the answer but turns a blind eye perhaps not wanting to offend those giving her a fat check.
Why does Moyo address Africa as a continent and not just individual countries? Does anyone know what percentage of African economies aid makes up?
Dambisa is right it is the responsibility of the government to provide solutions to Africa’s problems. The problem I have is that she seems to suggest that Africa’s solutions lie in Golden Sachs coming to Africa rather in Africans coming up with their own solutions as if they cannot come up with their own solutions.
I think that the fact that we have African entrepreneurs who are changing the lives in their own lives. She seems to feel that there is only one solution to Africa’s problem which negates her whole American experience. Americans believe that there is more than one solution to a given problem and this is perhaps the single genius of America. Just because there is bureaucracy in Zambia does not mean that her friend should have quit helping out her country. Look at Indians who are making it in India they are not full of excuses but have tenacity and perseverance to better their own land rather than making money bad mouthing their fellow people through overseas book sales.
Ms Moyo a Harvard and Oxford educated employee of the World Bank and Goldman Sachs has tremendous book knowledge of the continent, I am curious what her hands on experience is; and whether it goes beyond the boardroom and think tanks and lecture rooms. Perhaps Dambisa Moyo should run for President of Zambia and put into effect the ideas she espouses then we can judge whether or not they work.
What are Dambisa’s credentials in terms of what has she done besides her personal academic accomplishments and her employee status at prestigious firms? How many lives has she changed in Africa? Is it right for those who have received aid such as Dambisa herself to now become advocates against it just because they have benefited?


Creative Commons License
AfroStreet by AfroStreet is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

The danger of a single story

Her writing is fascinating i read Purple Hibiscus and it was great she makes Nigeria come alive on paper. A gifted writer and this piece is a synopsis of this brilliant mind.

Happy Birthday Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe turned 30 this week. It depends who you ask then ofcourse you get mixed reactions. So to commemorate this celebration i included a piece of writing from Zimbabwe's own illustrious son Chenjerai Hove one of my favorite authors. This piece gives insight into Zimbabwe's psychology.


Dogs of war still prowl
CHENJERAI HOVE - Dec 11 2009 13:04
A few days ago Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai repeated his call for Zimbabweans in the diaspora to return not only in person but with funds to rebuild the country.

He was jeered in London over the same call and caused much tension among Zimbabweans in Britain as the government there waved his speech at asylum-seekers as proof that things were fine and warned that they would be forcibly returned to the "comfort and safety" of home sweet home.

Zimbabweans are generally a peace-loving people to the point of sometimes being desolately apathetic. One unarmed man in a small powerful position can torment dozens of Zimbabweans and subdue them to silence. I remember a bus driver tormenting and threatening to throw me and another man out of the bus for protesting about his bad driving and the bribe he had given to a police officer manning a roadblock to be allowed to drive a bus with worn-out tyres.

None of the passengers supported our protest. They unanimously agreed to have us thrown out of the bus without a refund of our fare money. We were allowed to continue our trip only on condition of silent humiliation ("you don’t own a bus, so you can't control a bus").

But shortly afterwards, a front tyre burst and we ended up in a wheat field, lucky enough to have missed a huge tree on the roadside. It was only when their lives had been seriously threatened that the other passengers realised their folly in supporting the driver.

Some people think Zimbabweans are on the cowardly side when they employ what I call survival strategies. Faced with extreme danger to their person, Zimbabweans use two major approaches: run away or fall silent. So, the diasporans took the first option, to escape "to live to fight another day", as Bob Marley says. It is pointless to be a dead hero. No Zimbabwean will engage in "suicide bombing". What is the point of bombing and dying if you cannot live to enjoy the benefit of the act?

The prime minister has to assure the exiles that the reasons for their "running away" are no longer there, especially in terms of economic and personal welfare -- fear as well as psycho-emotional trauma inflicted on them by the state. But while he wants diasporans to return with their purses open, he does not assure them that the reasons millions of them left have been rectified. The political bus still has worn-out tyres.

Recently the youth development ministry announced that it has trained more than 80 000 Green Bombers in the Border Gezi camps. In the negotiations on outstanding issues there are substantial omissions -- such as who the Green Bombers are being trained to bomb. All ordinary Zimbabwean citizens know that they are the flies waiting to be devoured by these merciless youths trained in the arts of brutality and human degradation.

As an educationist, I would like to have Tsvangirai's government tell the nation the exact content of the training courses these youths go through. In normal schools parents know their children's curriculum. The instructors and teachers have well-recognised qualifications that give the public some confidence in what the students are learning in preparation for respectable careers and professions.

And, in normal schools, parents are assured of the quality of education and training by the frequent visits of inspectors and evaluators. Parents also have the right to visit and talk to the teachers and inspectors who are, as we say in teaching, acting in loco parentis, some kind of second parents.

But in these youth camps, no one is allowed to visit to see what their children are being taught. The results are visible only when the youths come out, equipped with all sorts of skills of human and material destruction. They are taught methods of torture, how to rape their own relatives, how to destroy houses and all sorts of property. At least, this is what Zimbabwean society sees them doing after leaving those camps.

The prime minister is not assuring us that if we return home to rebuild, the destructive youths will not be on standby to destroy, kill and maim as per their training. They are still President Robert Mugabe's little dogs of war, bent on terrorising their parents, political critics and opponents. It is as if Tsvangirai is saying: come home and, if you are not a member of the president’s party, share the violence with me.

Parliament is there, but basic changes to the laws that forced journalists and other citizens out of the country are not about to be made. The army and police are completely out of the control of the prime minister. Joint Home Affairs Minister Giles Mutsekwa makes a few noises about the arrest of one or two murder suspects, but every sane Zimbabwean knows that the Mwales, the Kitsiyatotas and the others will surely never be arrested anytime soon. They still salute their murderous bosses who wear medals and look forward to being buried at Heroes' Acre should they die anytime soon. The same murderers, rapists and torturers are still the heroes parading in our streets and villages.

Yes, the coalition government is a small sign of hope, but who wants a "small sign of hope" in the political turbulence that forced so many to abandon their whole lives and start afresh as beggars and nobodies in other lands? Even the prime minister himself is continually insulted, as he was when leader of the opposition. He is forbidden from appearing too much on national radio and TV. The new ministers are treated as if they do not exist.

Police chief Augustine Chihuri will never take orders from Giles Mutsekwa. And innocent people are still being arrested, tortured and imprisoned on fabricated charges. The "disappeared" are still unaccounted for and no one is about to be arrested for illegal abductions, torture and imprisonment of innocent citizens.

This is the scenario to which Tsvangirai wants people in the diaspora to return. The diasporans know that the Mugabe wing of the government does not respect a word of what they sign for. The Central Intelligence Organisation is still on the rampage, harassing innocent civilians going about their normal lives. The generals are having all they want in a political climate of fear that they know the ageing president thrives on.

I have a feeling that most Zanu-PF leaders are happy that the old man is so old that he has lost control. They are then in charge and no one seems to supervise their public conduct anymore. They can loot and plunder national wealth as well as human lives as long as they sing their daily praises to the "Supreme Leader". The Mugabe ministers have the permission of the president to ignore the prime minister or even insult him.

To the prime minister, for whom I have tremendous respect, I would say: please dismantle the national climate of fear and then ask the exiles to return. As long as the two wings of government are still antagonistic and separate, the people still feel they are being invited back to be the grass that suffers when two elephants fight. Unfortunately, of the two elephants, one has its tusks still intact while the other has only its soft trunk.

Chenjerai Hove is a prize-winning Zimbabwean author living in Europe

Source: Mail & Guardian Online
Web Address: http://www.mg.co.za/article/2009-12-11-dogs-of-war-still-prowl

New Kenyan Middle class


I am surprised that people are making a big deal out of it. Globalization is happening and it is a great time to be in an emerging economy. Africans have always been workers in big corporations so what's new? That happened well since independence. Was the Kenyan experience ever monolithic? I want to see reports on the Africans who own the banks!

African American Entrepreneurs

http://wp.me/pMo8T-z

Perfected Passion Produces Prosperity

<strong> </strong>
We are programmed to get jobs that fulfill the dreams of others while our dreams die and we forget we ever had them. Jobs don’t provide security, they don’t provide the possibility of being at the top of the company …and they don’t provide residual income. They only provide a means to exist until you’re too old to work then they simply bring in another slave.
Discover what you love to do, and because you’re so good at it, people will pay you to do it. Anyone who is bold enough to discover their passion, added to the and add the perseverance to perfect it, will live a fulfilling and prosperous life. Create the plan to live your dream life. Go ahead, do it!!!
Posted by Charlene

Welcome World

This is a site dedicated to those who want to know how to stay abreast in the new global age by sharing information.  Knowledge is power and the reason that we are not in the position that we would like to be is because of what we don’t know. There is so much data out there but we want to provide real information that you can use that can change your life.

"Good writing does not succeed or fail on the strength of its ability to persuade. It succeeds or fails on the strength of its ability to engage you, to make you think, to give you a glimpse into someone else’s head. "
— Malcolm Gladwell (What the Dog Saw and Other Adventures)